
National
Legislation Supported
by the
DWIGHT LYDELL CHAPTER OF THE IZAAK WALTON LEAGUE
Visit the Contact Your Elected Officials links page to let your legislators know of your opinion. It counts!
The Conservation Reinvestment Act (CARA)
The Conservation and Reinvestment Act
(CARA), HR 701, passed the US House of Representatives in the 106th Congress with a
bipartisan vote of 315-102. However, it failed to pass in the Senate. It has been
re-introduced in the 107th Congress with the same name and number.
Under CARA, $2.8 billion a year in
federal revenue from Outer Continental Shelf oil and gas leases would be spread to all 50
states and US protectorates. The money would be used for a range of conservation
activities including: fish and wildlife rehabilitation projects, land restoration,
conservation easements and purchases, historic site preservation, and for urban, state and
local parks. States, such as Michigan, would receive extra funds for shoreline
impact assistance and coastal conservation. In total, Michigan would receive $50-$60
million annually. This is not a tax, but simply taking an item off budget and diverting
some funds from the annual budget process.
Congress established the Land and Water
Conservation Fund 36 years ago and authorized an annual appropriation of $900 million to
the fund. But for the last 20 years, rarely has the fund received a third of the
appropriation. For a number of years now, congressmen and conservationists have been
searching for a good way to make up this underfunding and support the wide range of
wildlife and conservation needs. The result is CARA that was written with a great
amount of bipartisan effort, and would provide for long term planning and subsequent
funding
Representative Don Young of Alaska is the
sponsor of the bill. There are already eight co-sponsors including John Dingell and
Dale Kildee from Michigan. The bill was referred to the House Committee on Resources
on February 14, 2001. We need to contact Michigan Senators Stabenow and Carl Levin
and Representatives Bracia, Bonier, Camp, Conyers, Ehlers, Hoekstra, Kilpatrick, Sander
Levin, Rogers, Rivers, Stupak, and Upton and ask them to also become co-sponsors of the
bill and to move it through Congress. All of Michigans Congressional Delegation
except one supported this legislation last year.
Senators and Representatives need to be contacted NOW to let them know of your interest and concern that these bills get made into law. The names, phone numbers, fax numbers and e-mail addresses of Michigan Senators and Congressmen from this area are on the back side of this information sheet, or they can be reached by calling the Capitol Switchboard at 202-224-3121 and asking for their office.
AS
PASSED BY THE IZAAK WALTON LEAGUE AT ITS NATIONAL CONVENTION, JULY 2000
Everyday, the Great Lakes are being invaded by exotic (non-native) aquatic organisms and
pathogens transported from foreign waters. Primarily they arrive in the ballast water
discharged by ships using our inland waterways. Previously introduced exotic
species, such as Eurasian ruffe and round goby, are being carried in ballast water from
one Great Lakes port to another. Once introduced and established, these non-native
aquatic organisms are expensive to control and almost impossible to eliminate.
The impact on sport and commercial fisheries (worth an estimated $4 billion annually) is
immense, as exotic species displace or deplete important sources of food for native fish.
Moreover, shoreline communities are being forced to spend an estimated $500 million
annually on control measures to protect drinking water, power plants, and recreational
facilities. To make matters worse, some of these aquatic organisms, such as zebra mussels
and Eurasian watermilfoil, are now making their way into inland lakes and streams across
the United States where they are displacing native animal and plant species.
The ballast water that harbors these invaders is used to maintain the stability of cargo
vessels when they are empty or only partially loaded. It is pumped in or out of large
holding tanks, as needed, before the ships leave port. Although U.S. and Canadian laws
currently require ships entering the Great Lakes to exchange their ballast water at sea,
ship design makes it impossible to eliminate all of the ballast water. The average ship
retains 42,000 gallons of ballast water and sludge when entering the Great Lakes or moving
between ports. Exotic organisms are flushed into the lakes as ships take on and discharge
ballast water in the course of their voyages.
The present federal laws have clearly failed to prevent exotic species in this residual
ballast water from reaching the Great Lakes. Several new aquatic organisms have been
introduced into the Great Lakes since these laws were enacted in 1988-89.
On April 7, 2000, federal legislation - the Great Lakes Ecology Protection Act of 2000
(H.R. 4191) - was introduced to address the issue. The bill would amend the Nonindigenous
Aquatic Nuisance Control and Protection Act of 1990 by requiring ships traveling in and
out of the Great Lakes to purify their ballast water prior to discharge and certify that
any discharge or exchange within the Great Lakes will not introduce any Nonindigenous
organisms.
The Izaak Walton League of America, assembled in convention at Des Moines, Iowa, July 15,
2000, urges Congress to promptly pass legislation requiring the use of environmentally
sound treatment methods for ballast water and sediments, such as sterilization, by all
ships capable of discharging ballast water, whether equipped with ballast tank systems or
otherwise. Additionally, upon enactment of such legislation, the League calls on
federal authorities to take immediate action to implement its provisions and intent,
inspecting vessels and taking enforcement action as necessary to ensure strict compliance
with the law.
Gaithersburg, Md. - The promise of "fishable and swimmable
waters"
The Fishable Waters Act is the product of several years of effort by a
"This locally led, incentives-based approach for cleaning our waters and
restoring our fisheries offers a new and exciting tool that will
Separate provisions of the bill address urban fisheries, fish habitat issues
in major waterways and acquisition of water rights from willing